Canon SX200IS Blue Christmas Sales!
![]() |
Canon SX200IS Blue Christmas Sales!.
Product: Canon SX200IS Blue Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon SX200IS Blue
I have been a Canon shooter for many years, both DSLRs and point and shoots. I enjoy a Canon G7 for personal expend and have been extremely joyful with it, but I am tired of having to add attachments for wide angle and telephoto photography. I also wanted a camera that is limited enough to do in a jacket or shirt pocket easily. I decided that of the cameras currently on the market, either the Panasonic Lumix ZS3 or Canon SX200 seemed to be what I was looking for. I researched the product thoroughly and chose the Lumix ZS3 based on multiple reviews that gave that camera the nod over the SX200. (Specifications-wise, these cameras are approach twins.)
After several days of testing the ZS3 I was sorrowful with it. The camera had bad low-light performance, a conventional flash, and terrible color balance and difference. (Contemplate my review of that camera on its Amazon product page.) I returned it and bought an SX200. This camera is a gem. The quality of the photos are what I was expecting from a camera in this tag range (better given how great cheaper it is than a ZS3) . The zoom is very rapid which allows you to focus on the action hastily and come by the shot you are looking for. (The zoom on the ZS3 is insensible in comparison.)
The camera performs well in coarse light--much better than the ZS3. There is very dinky noise and Canon's optical stabilization allows for lower ISO and shutter speeds. The SX200 has a great flash that illuminates the subject very well and at a excellent distance. I am positive fragment of the reason for this is the great maligned pop-flash, as this helps the flash definite the stout lens barrel. Also, the fact the flash pops up when not in employ is something that I barely spy. (Determined, it would be nice if it didn't.) The overall quality in uncouth light will not compare to a DSLR, but that is to be expected.
I will say that, like my G7, this camera seems to struggle a microscopic in very quick-witted outdoor conditions. Specifically, highlights have a tendency to fetch blown out if you are not careful. Even when using the exposure compensation this can calm be problematic. However, the day has to be VERY smart for this to be a plight. Also, this is where Canon's variety of shooting modes helps, as using the Shutter Priority mode has helped me in this station to fetch suitable results.
The create quality of this camera is obedient. The physical controls are very well-done, and the on-camera software is first rate and worthy better than the ZS3. The Canon software is not only easier to employ and has more controls, but it honest looks better with suited fonts and translucent menus.
The color saturation and white balance are kindly, and the different shooting modes (program mode, aperture mode, manual, etc.) give the photographer a wide range of options that are not available on the ZS3. I exercise these modes probably more than half the time.
I almost gave the camera four stars on the anecdote of it not having optical zoom in video, but at this effect point and given all the other obedient features of the camera (wide angle, 12x zoom, proper software, etc.) I don't mediate that would be shapely. The HD video is of beneficial quality, though I have to give the nod to the ZS3 on the video overall.
The only other negatives are the door to access the data ports, which has a flimsy plastic hinge, and the lack of a "smart resplendent" quality mode for the jpegs like they had on my G7. (I really wish they would include RAW, but I know they reserve that for their high-end cameras.)
Summary:
Pros:
Excellent physical quality
Excellent on-camera software
Good grievous light performance
Powerful flash
Good HD video
Excellent color balance and contrast
Variety of shooting modes and manual controls
Cons:
No optical zoom in video
Flimsy hinge on the data ports door
Lack of well-organized fair quality mode
Tendency for overexposure in highlights on very shimmering days
Overall, an honorable pick especially for the stamp.
just got this after reading some of the reviews. here's what i believe. represent quality it helpful, even at iso400 like all the other reviewers said but it is collected a point and shoot, so don't seek information from slr type of lens hurry.
pros:
-great zoom 12x
-great video quality (no optical zoom but it has digital)
-manual control, for a compact which is substantial!
cons:
-flash pops up (this doesn't bother me as worthy but it is annoying)
-compact size but longer...from the describe it looks to be a obliging size but it is a bit longer (width) and thicker than i would like.
all in all, a pleasurable compact (not sub-compact) with manual controls and respectable characterize quality. i've had nikon cameras all my life and this is my first canon (i know, i know), the only reason i didn't rep a nikon is because they don't have a decent super-zoom compact, there's the p6000 but...lots of issues with that. anyways, nice camera!
I sold my Canon G7 because its zoom lens was heavenly bad once it moved into digital zoom mode. The SX200IS has an optical zoom to 12x and takes very inspiring photos even in the 10-12x range. It's easy to employ and can be mature by novices (objective location it on Auto mode) or by heavenly advanced users (you can manually control almost every aspect of the camera) . The only recent learning required for using this camera is to disappear your fingers off the pop-up flash at the top of the camera (not a enormous deal) . Definitely recommended for someone who doesn't want to lug a large camera but wants a lot of features and control.












